To Torrington

So, today Grandpa, Grandma, and I woke up in the Holiday Inn and Suites in Torrington, Wyoming. We travelled from Minneapolis beginning late Tuesday morning, and we've been on the road since then until yesterday, early afternoon.

We're here for Grandpa's 70th high school reunion, but the unfortunate fact of the matter is that we don't know where it'll be, when it'll be, or if it's even happening at all. Grandpa neglected to bring his invitation along, so we only really have a couple things to go on: the woman who was setting up the reunion and sent the invitation (I think), the high school itself (they might know about reunions, I assume), and Grandpa's fantastic idea of driving up and down main street, shaking locals by the shoulders until we get the information we're looking for.

How could we fail.

I took a badly-needed shower last night, and this morning while trying to get my hair to behave, realized it's time for another haircut. The last one I got was pretty excellent, actually, so I think I'll try to go the same place and see the same stylist...but that'll have to wait until I get home.

Grandpa tells me that the woman organizing this works at a museum locally.

This is the route we've taken so far, basically Google Maps' recommendation except for going south on 35W (spent about 20-30 minutes in traffic) and taking a detour yesterday afternoon into Scott's Bluff in Nebraska. We took some lovely shots, including the below, which Grandpa graciously took of me.

At this point, the plan is to visit the Homesteader's Museum in Torrington, where Grandpa says "they should know if there's something going on." Here's the Google street view of that location:

I guess if we're able to find something there, we'll be able to go there and see what we see.

It's a bit unfortunate that we didn't plan this a bit better, to know where we were going and what we wanted to see, but our plan initially was to see the Badlands, the Black Hills, Custer State Park, and Mount Rushmore on the way out, but it seems more likely that we'll see those things on the way back, likely with a stop in Custer or its State Park, possibly in a nice lodge or cabin up there.

Somehow I caught up on my devotions this morning and got in my physical therapy exercises last night, so hopefully I can keep up with all of that. My appointment the morning we left added a couple exercises onto my regimen and they're daily instead of every other day, which is a little more difficult to work in.

Here's a shot of Grandpa on Scott's Bluff.

Thanks for reading; I'll try to update as soon as I can.

Pray for Grandma and Grandpa, they're doing alright, but a trip like this is no longer easy at their age.

Noah

In the year of our Lord 2018

I've been thinking for a while that I'd like to write a bit about what happened in 2018 in my life. I thought it would be helpful for me to have a bit of perspective on the things God's done in my life this past year. I'll start with something I've told a lot of people as a result of trying to pursue a few girls via dating apps and sites this past year.

One of the questions I'd ask these girls (obviously proud of my originality and depth) was, "What's something important you learned this past year?"

My answer (when they inevitably turned the question back to me) had a lot to do with me realizing that I wasn't to blame for everything that went wrong in my life. Relationships have pretty invariably not worked out, not started, not lasted, or just plain exploded for me, and not just outside of this past year.

Relationships, I don't know why 

They never work out and they make you cry 

But the guy that says goodbye to you 

Is out of his mind

-- Griffin House

In conjunction with the above realization, I've begrudgingly realized that I can take responsibility for these things I blame myself for, but without blaming myself for them once things go badly.

As a result, I spent a lot of time on what can only by unreasonable charity be called introspection, and which more honestly equates to emotional self-harm.

"I'm incapable of friendship."
...because I've long given up hope that I'll have friendships that last and plumb the depths that I truly yearn for.

"I'm not worth her."
...because I'm not sure whether she likes me.

"Why would anyone like me?"
You get the picture, and with any luck this will be relatable.

Relatable...I'd say that's another way I've grown this past year. I've realized that every assumption I make that I'm like or unlike the rest of humanity is too quick, too unlikely. There are a lot of ways I'm like the rest of humanity, and a lot that I'm unlike them, but making assumptions about those kinds of things made me impatient, callous, and thoughtless.

I believed toward the beginning of this year that I had committed an unforgivable offense; I don't say sin, because I couldn't easily pin down what exactly I'd done. It was a difficult relationship issue, exacerbated by history I didn't know and myself that I did.

But I was forgiven. For a few precious days, I knew with crystal clarity that God's forgiveness was greater than all my sin, and that no amount of my failure or insufficiency would be too much.

Perhaps forgetfulness is too much for God's grace.

Another epiphany I've had is that because my memory for God's work in my own life is so often forgotten, I should probably make use of the stories and memories that do stick, regardless of where they come from.

I guess I chose to limit my pool of evidence for God's love for me to the things he's done in my own life; and while those things are not insignificant, I'm well-equipped to forget them before God makes the effort to shake me by the shoulders and prove himself again. Oh, how blind, how forgetful am I.

I believe in 2018, I did learn to be a better friend. However, I learned it by pursuing a girl who ultimately didn't have any interest in me. I spent time and effort being there for her, caring about her struggles, praying for her daily, eating with her, being around her, being attentive and thoughtful.

I maintain that during this period of time, I grew more as a person (and was aware of that growth) more than I've ever grown before. I spent more time in God's word in 2018 than I had likely for the last ten years of my life.

And among the more impressive feats that I accomplished this past year, I maintained a good daily regimen and routine before, up to, and beyond the time she rejected me. This didn't strike me as impressive at the time; it took the perspective of a good friend to make me understand that I was feeling pain strong enough that getting out of bed was nothing short of Herculean.

Don't think I didn't know I was in pain; I knew. I was frustrated, confused, and above all, in agony. I recognize that comparing physical and emotional pain doesn't really make any sense, but I would say that despite breaking my femur about ten years ago, I've felt nothing more painful than what I felt being rejected this past year. I was in pain for months, and I likely spilt more tears in 2018 than I have in the last five or ten years combined as well.

Despite this, for several months following her rejection, I kept waking up early in the morning, exercising, cleaning my body, getting out the door and to work on time, somehow eating healthy at the same time, and much or all of that has been maintained, in some measure or another, to this day.

That isn't me; I can't even imagine taking credit for that. I was too blind to even realize how exceptional it was. Previous times in my life, I would have turned to my various addictions to allay my pain, but in this case, those turns were few and far between.

I'm writing this down in part because of what I mentioned earlier; I'm bad at remembering God's grace to me. And what I'm saying is, God has been abundantly graceful and generous and kind and has even given me insight into my own growth...at the same time.

I'm more confident than I've been before, despite a crucible of my own making (see what I mean about blaming myself?), more competent than I've ever been before, more capable than before.

God is good, and I mean not to forget it, if I can help it.

Obviously this isn't exhaustive, but it's a thousand words, so you're probably tired of this wilting word salad anyway.

I've been journaling a bit recently, and I think there may be days when you will see my journal, and other days when I'll write separately from my journal, but I hope to continue the cogitation; I hope you'll continue reading.


!Noah!

God With Us

In my life, it's become a pretty solid habit to be skeptical of people and things as a matter of course, and if for no other reason than to offset my propensity toward gullibility, it's a good habit to have.

However, it's been used often enough by the Devil to bring into question God's love for me, his grace toward me, and his will for my good. I think in my head that the thoughts in my head have nothing to do with him or his desire for my sanctification.

Be there any goodness in my thoughts and actions?

Why, it must be my "good Christian upbringing," and an "innate favor toward honesty," of course. A moment of generosity or kindness, hospitality or forgiveness...

Ah, the character of Noah. What merit, what heart, what unending patience.

Hogwash.

What folly that I should think such high thoughts of myself. So many of the confessions we say in church sound so pompous and foolish to me as I say them, but perhaps if I weren't a pompous, arrogant fool it wouldn't sound so.

It would do me good to see God's hand more. My cynicism assures me time and time again that God doesn't do that sort of thing, he isn't really near or in me...no, it's all in your head, perhaps in your heart too, but God?

This habitual cynicism bears down upon the miracles of today, as well. I grew up Lutheran and Presbyterian, and never had much faith for miraculous healing. I remember once cautioning a friend that one couldn't always believe what one read or heard from friends of faith and belief, change and healing.

None of this to say we should have minds free from skepticism; skepticism is extremely valuable; it is the darker side of the coin that is discernment. I'm not sure what I'd call the other side of the coin, but as is often the case, the analogy will break down if I spend too much time on it, so I'll pass on.


All this to say, I must remember that God IS present, he IS powerful, and he IS changing me, despite my best efforts and without immediate regard for my own comfort or understanding.

The goodness in me, generosity in me, the hope in me, the love in me, the grace in me, whatever good I have or show or am...

All is not only owed to Christ, but owned by him, and proceeds to purchase souls to glorify him and love him more.

Unfortunately yours,


!Noah!

Blockhead Sans Belonging

I do not belong here.

That's what's been knocking around in my head for the last several months. I got a job back in April which (for the last two to three months) has put me in the company of friends between the hours of 4 PM and midnight, in a sufficient but not extravagant kitchen somewhere in Dinkytown.

I've known since before I got the job that I wouldn't enjoy it. I was hoping, at the time, that I'd stop cooking and start serving within a few months, something I, despite being an introvert, have shown some aptitude for. Not so.

I don't belong there. I love my coworkers and have only rarely resented their company, my managers are between neutral and decidedly familial. I have often enjoyed parts of my job, but as a whole it's something I desperately want to put behind me.

The same applies to my childhood home. I'm 23 at present, going on 24, as a pair of young lovebirds might say, and haven't the means I think I need to enter a new stage of life.

In case I found cause, at this point, to revive my efforts, motivations, and pursuits, I've had a number of personal defeats as of late; rejection, temptation to addiction, solitude simultaneously excessive and insufficient.

So here I am, screaming unto the night. And why?

Why?


!Noah!

Trust, Innocence, and Bias

Back when I was reporting on elections within Islas, a group of students who gathered online and, on rare occasions, in person, I wrote outrageous stories documenting the votes as they came in, the candidates and the differences between their vote counts, and typically inserted a claim of a complete lack of bias somewhere along the way.

The mainstream media makes no such overt claim, and my contention is that they know they're biased and that they couldn't reasonably claim otherwise and expect people to believe them.

Maybe the day is coming when they will and can make that claim and be believed.

But I'm talking about today.

As of today, there have been two recent, high-profile incidents wherein a black man was killed by a police officer.

Now, the guilt of the officers is not mine to judge; ultimately, their guilt may not even be accurately determined by investigation and the minds of attorneys and judges.

What I'm here to write about, and what I believe is a despicable and manipulative evil, is the bias the media shows concerning the character of the victims in these incidents.

From heavy.com: "Philando Castile: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know"

1. He Was a Beloved School Cafeteria Worker Who Snuck Extra Graham Crackers to Children 

2. He Was a Straight-A Student in High School & Had Only a Minor Criminal Record 

3. He Frequently Posted About Social Justice Causes, & His Sister Posted About Alton Sterling Just Hours Before Castile’s Death 

4. Castile Had a Concealed Carry Permit, According to His Girlfriend, & Informed the Officer That He Was Armed 

5. Protests Erupted in the Wake of the Shooting, & the Governor Called for a Federal Investigation

So Castile was an innocent, unassuming, and ordinary individual with a "minor" criminal record? (other sites are spreading modified lists which claim he had "no criminal record,")

And allegedly he was pulled over and shot exclusively because of the color of his skin?

The fact is, Castile had been pulled over, charged, convicted, and sentenced for dozens of traffic offenses.

In addition, according to police radios, Castile was a suspect in an armed robbery no more than one day prior to his death.

In a recording submitted by a "KARE11 viewer" which seems to contain the officers' transmissions during the incident, one of the officers stated on the radio that he thought Castile matched the description of one of the perpetrators of an armed robbery the previous day.

If one were to watch any one story on the major news stations on the subject, one might believe that both Alton Sterling and Philando Castile were law-abiding, normal, ordinary, average citizens like you and I. You might believe, following such a report, that these men were, indeed, individually targeted exclusively because of their race.

In both cases, this is at best misleading, and more likely a bald-faced lie which slowly but surely erodes the trust between citizens (particularly black Americans) and police officers.

I cannot emphasize enough how much this troubles me. I believe it to be a true evil to report as truth that Philando Castile and Alton Sterling were upstanding, good-natured, ordinary people.

The fact is that neither of them were like you or I. Most of my readers are most likely not sex offenders, and most of my readers have most likely never robbed a convenience store at gunpoint. Most of my readers haven't brandished an illegal gun in a parking lot and said, "I told you to leave me alone," when a homeless person persists in asking for money.


What's my point? My point is definitely not that Castile or Sterling deserved to die. The fact that they were criminals, or had committed crimes in the past, has no bearing on whether a police officer should shoot them during a traffic stop or even an arrest.

My point is that the media's obsessive empathy with the victims of these horrific tragedies turns a blind eye to the fact that many of these victims aren't innocent and law-abiding citizens. Certainly before the incidents they were criminal in their actions, and in both cases it seems they were actively disobeying the law; Castile a suspect in an armed robbery, Sterling illegally carrying a firearm.

This speaks nothing to the immeasurable importance of being calm, collected, and cooperative with police officers during any and all encounters with them. I believe neither Sterling nor Castile were any of these things, as in both cases they had reason at the very least to be defensive and unhelpful, and at worst, to fear the just eye of the law.

I must reiterate what I said before, because I believe it is simply a matter of life and death, in particular to black Americans.

If the mainstream media continues to profess the victims of these incidents as not only ordinary, kind people, but also truly innocent of any and all wrongdoing, the trust between black people and cops will disintegrate and eventually be utterly lost.


A deficit of trust between cops and citizens is immeasurably perilous. As this trust erodes, our servant protectors are rendered impotent.


!Noah!

The Humility of Patience

Something occurred to me, as I was laying in bed, thinking about my choices and options going forward in the coming days and weeks.

Of late, a few things are on my mind with particular weight, not the least of which is this girl I know. She and I have a number of interests and passions in common, and my feelings and desire tell me to immediately act on them. They tell me, "What if tomorrow she met someone else?"

I guess this is fear. I'm afraid that she'll find someone to love her, and I'll "miss out."

What a fool am I.

The problem with this attitude is that, by it, I make the assumption that there's no better man for her in this world than myself. Either that, or, when all is said and done, I'm not the best man for her, and I actually don't care what's best for her.

To put it simply, that complete lack of humility, in my view, makes the difference between love and hate. If love is the giving of oneself for the benefit of another, and hate the giving of another for the benefit of oneself, then I do, indeed, hate her by presuming to be the best person to know her and love her.

And this says nothing of how insulting it is to assume she'd choose someone unfit, unkind, or unloving, which, incidentally, is exactly what I become if I pridefully presume to be the best for her.

That is, through my lack of humility, I make myself less able (also less worthy) to love her truly.

I've lived my life patient, by my estimation. Sure, I'm not always patient, sometimes I feel impatience, and I certainly act on it from time to time. But when things matter, when I probably should be pushing and driving both myself and others to be better, I usually wait and prefer hope instead of action.

Thus, it grates on my very soul to turn again to patience as the best course of action, but I think in this case it may be best. If for impatience' sake I would either think less of her, or more of myself, then I'd say I've sabotaged the endeavor from the outset.

Perhaps I should act today, but I know with absolute certainty I should never act motivated by the fear that she would "find someone better".

If anything, I should pray to God she finds someone Godlier than I. Quickly.


!Noah!

Love, feelings, and all that stuff

So, a few years back, I met this girl who is incredibly kind, loves people, is intelligent and funny, and to top it all off, is a sort of classically gorgeous which is usually lost under all manner of superficial facades or deep character flaws these days.

I obsessed and I pined and, to the best of my ability, spent my time being around her, talking to her, engaging with her, learning more about her, but, until about two years later, never overtly insinuating or indicating that I had any interest in her.

There's a part of me which still contends that this is the best way to approach things. A guy and a girl should know each other reasonably well before they start dating, right? Right?

I'm not so sure anymore.

Part of my hesitance to accept that approach is that I have little or no success engaging with people in group settings. I'm not a very talkative guy, and I know it. I further know that it's not an issue. There are situations where I need to talk or I should talk, and I'm willing and able to do so. However, to engage in highly social settings with people I barely know with the ulterior motive of romance?

About that I have serious reservations. I don't easily engage and commit to people without similar or greater commitment on their part. I guess this is probably part of the problem, but being an introvert, I find it much more easy to engage with a single person and avoid, ignore, or block out the rest of the world.

That's kind of how I ended up asking out this same girl; it was just after church, with dozens of friends, acquaintances, fellow church goers, and a few family members nearby. People were conversing energetically as they always do. I noticed she had some buffer between her and surrounding people, so I saw my opportunity, walked up to her, and asked her out on a date in plain English with a normal tone of voice.

I remember that she told me she admired my boldness, which I guess I appreciate. To me, it felt marginally safe; in my mind, the rest of the room had sort of ceased to exist for a time. It wasn't that much of a distance between us and everyone else; perhaps some of them realized even what was happening.

She said no. It's been a year or two since then, and I haven't completely stopped feeling like I did.

But the fact is, if my only standard is that of being rejected by one girl; that is, that's the highest, the furthest I've gotten when it comes to advancing my affection into reality as word and action...then I have as much gotten over her as I will until the moment I ask someone else out.

My feelings are equally strong for girls I've met since then. Does this mean that I've forgotten her character and beauty, and have moved on? Why should I still feel, then? Why aren't I still numb? Well, why shouldn't I feel? I didn't commit to her in any way, shape, or form, except by my own design and in my own mind. Yes, the feelings still remain; I still wish, wonder, and hope with the determination of a fool and utter inaction to match.

But, why should I act? Why should I care? She said no. I believe that to second-guess her choice or motives would be to consider her either a flighty and fickle human (like myself), or a liar. I choose to believe she is neither.

"But," quoth the self-same fool, "I like her so much!"

So what? If you love her, (that is, if you functionally care more about her than you do about yourself) it doesn't matter how you feel, you will still do what's best for her, regardless of the consequences to you or your feelings.

Get over it. Forget her. Move on.

"How can you be so heartless," the fool whimpers.

There is no heart in feeling. The heart chooses another's peace, happiness, and well-being over their own...or it chooses to serve itself and its own desires. The heart is what chooses to suffocate mere feelings and keep walking. Heart is what makes the world work instead of merely wishing it did.

A principle I've adopted as my own (from where, I can't exactly remember) is that one's emotions should either match one's actions in equal measure, or be abandoned in favor of emotions which do drive you to love; to love truly; to place your own desires and well-being second to someone else's.

Do your feelings drive you to love her? Then do so.
Do your feelings drive you to hate her? Cast them far from you.


!Noah!

Star Wars: The Death of Subtlty, Imagination, and Wit

Read further for spoilers, potentially in the worst possible sense.

I'm not a seasoned movie reviewer, not the best of Star Wars fans, and probably ought to think a bit before writing further.

But I'm not going to.

I tend to have a hard time holding onto ideas and thoughts, and thus I've decided to write at least a preliminary review immediately. If I see the movie again (ideally after a highly critical re-watch of the original trilogy), I may revise this review to reflect any additions or changes in my opinion.

But, yeah. This is my opinion. It will most likely be a long series of incomprehensible tangents, but they're my incomprehensible tangents.

Again, if you proceed further, expect not only spoilers to the actual plot, but potentially a spoiler for the experience as a whole, because...I don't think they did right by the series.

In the beginning, we find ourselves on yet another desert planet. I don't necessarily fault anyone for this, it just seems to be a common trend, for no obvious reason. Maybe Jedis only originate from deserts?

Anyway, we find ourselves in another desert colony. Our hero, at least for now, seems to be a pilot, part of the Resistance (oh, how I loathe that they chose that name. As if "The Rebel Alliance" wasn't original enough). He's got an X-wing fighter with him, to retrieve a small portion of a map which will lead, eventually, to Luke Skywalker.

And Luke, for whatever  reason, has decided to leave his Jedi way and hermit it up on some lush, ancient island in some remote, unknown corner of the galaxy. Being a Jedi is just too hard, I guess. After all those years, things just got tough. He had to, you know?

And let's talk about Han (I promised tangents, remember?).

So the dude has apparently had a son with Leia (yay!), but become soft in his old age, despite the fact that almost everything has gone wrong since the end of the Return of the Jedi.

No, really. His son becomes a Jedi, trains under Luke, and, for a reason I've either forgotten (good job telling me that story in the first place, then), or was never explained in the first place. He leaves Leia and returns to his smuggling ways, "the only thing I'm good at," or something like that.

Despite all this, not only is he in debt to at least two separate criminal enterprises (I don't know, I guess he's a scoundrel or something), but he's become soft and easy, with quips well-suited to television for toddlers. Random girl steals your beloved Falcon and is found stowed in the honestly completely obvious grilles which were supposedly sufficient to hide the crew in the original trilogy, and what is his response? I'll drop you at the nearest planet.

Original trilogy Han would have tossed both her and "Finn" straight into the brig, or more likely still, left them to explore the never-ending, icy cold, soul sucking darkness of space.

That's not the least of Han's sins. Han would have to become an especially epic kind of soft to do the incredibly foolish thing he did. Han is a survivor of survivors, proven still more by the fact that he's back after all these years, still smuggling and fighting.

JJ did Han a huge dishonor by allowing his character to be so changed from his original self. There's no good reason for this change. He got married, had a Jedi kid, and said kid turned to the dark side?

If anything, my guess is Han would have become more cynical, calculated, cruel. To have someone so beloved torn from you by basically evil itself would make you feel helpless and desperately lost.

I must move on. Han, though, is probably the greatest sin this movie has to offer.

The movie is gorgeous. Spectacular. Shiny, bright, impressive.

The plot, meanwhile, is basically A New Hope, but this time, it's bigger! It's prettier! And you can sure as heck depend on there being women and "minorities" everywhere, from the Stormtroopers (who were cloned from a man, as I recall), to the heroine herself, to Finn, to the pilots of the X-wings.

There's nothing wrong with that. But it makes the movie no better if the only thing different or better about it is skin-deep.

Rey I like. But what am I supposed to do. She's an attractive young woman. Her garb is flattering, and she does justice to Star Wars' trend of having beautiful women in leading roles.

However, I don't think her character is worth the pixels she appears on.

Again, I may seem harsh, but I did warn you that, A. This is my opinion. Take it or leave it, and, B. Spoilers.

Why don't I like Rey's character?

It's far too easy for her. The story may develop and explain this in later movies (we are getting another trilogy, I'm assuming), but Rey learns to use the Force with such incredible speed, it's absurd.

For Luke, grasping the Force took at least days, likely longer (we're never really clued into how long the entire thing took). Even after he trained with Yoda, he was "not ready," as both Yoda and Obi-Wan said. Rey, without prior knowledge or preparation, performs a Jedi Mind Trick on a Stormtrooper. Yeah, it took her three tries, but even that isn't something Luke would so quickly grasp.

There's the possibility that Rey was child to two force-sensitive parents, rather than Luke and Anakin's one.

Perhaps "The Force Awakens" is more than well-worded bait for eager fans. Perhaps they actually mean that the power of the Force itself is growing, such that more people are attuned to it, or those who are, are "better" tuned to it. If this is the case, it could be the explanation for Rey's incredible power and quick learning.

But then shouldn't a trained Sith (I assume that, as Jedi are still a thing, Sith are as well, despite the fact that the name was rarely or never mentioned) be far, far more powerful than an untrained Force-sensitive young woman?

And furthermore, the first time she wields a lightsaber, she fights like someone who at least knows how to duel with swords/lightsabers of some sort. Perhaps not with great proficiency, or with much strength, but enough to keep her from dying swiftly.

So option 1 is that Rey is a spectacularly powerful Jedi in the making, or option 2, that Kylo Ren is no more than a simpering, power-hungry man-child with a fancy "laser sword," as his "grandfather" once called it.

Kylo Ren. Apparently "Ren" is now what "Darth" was before it...or something like that? It's confusing. I forgot what Kylo's given name was, as well. Maybe I wasn't intended to remember that information? Anyway.

Kylo Ren, like Darth Vader before him, sounds deadly and terrifying, but unlike Darth Vader, at the request of his father, he willingly removes his helmet, removing all mystery and potential for imagination. Oh, and it's no secret from easily one third through the movie who Kylo Ren is. And the reveal is unimpressive, as if an afterthought. It's depressing.

Kylo Ren, in an absurdly cliched manner, "softens up" to his father before he...

Oh, and he goes to "Supreme Leader" Snoke like the simpering child I described before. Almost like this pathetic commander is his equal. If he were a child rushing to his parents to tell his side of the story first, it would be far more believable. "Mommy, it's his fault, not mine!"

In a long line of villains who were either human, though torn and destroyed by evil, or villains who were essentially beings composed of corruption, power, and evil itself, who actually did strike fear into their subjects (think back to the second Death Star; Darth Vader arrives, scaring the commander there quite enough, but then brings news that the Emperor himself will arrive shortly; that man looked scared), Kylo Ren is a disappointment. He goes before his master as he were equal with a lowly military official. Darth Vader murdered at least three of the commanding officers on Star Destroyers and the two Death Stars during the original trilogy.

I recall Kylo Ren murdering no fellow "First Order" members.

Oh, and the "First Order"?

Please. The resemblance to Nazi Germany is not lost on me, but explain to me the exact point of giving a bloody pep talk to a few thousand Stormtroopers? Aren't they going to do your bidding to the best of their ability anyway?

And what's with Finn "waking up"? The Force "awoke" him as well, I suppose? After all, he knew well enough how to use a lightsaber too. He got himself hurt and basically would have been dead but for Rey's helpful interference. But he lasted a good five or ten seconds with a weapon he'd used for a good thirty seconds maximum, versus someone who at least should have trained for weeks, months, probably even years, if you count Luke's training as well.

Compared to Kylo Ren, Rey and Finn should both be well-cooked mincemeat. (explain to me why a weapon hot enough to burn through solid metal can't completely and permanently cauterize a wound; looking at you, Kylo Ren)

Let's get back to the "First Order," though. The fact that you think you're the "First Order" means either you think you're better than everything than came before, or you are simply ignorant (willingly or otherwise) of those who came before you. Yoda, Sidious, Dooku, Qui-Gon, Obi-Wan; they cam before you, and they mattered. This is no "First Order".

Maybe the First Order refers to their supposed objective of ridding the galaxy of chaos and strife? Perhaps that's it. Yes, let's destroy a half a dozen planets, march Stormtroopers in circles around every planet, and we'll all be happy.

But wait! There's more! There's a new Death Star! And this time, it's bigger! This time, it's better! This time, it siphons energy from stars into its core, somehow converting that into a big curvy laser beam that splits into multiple beams, and you can see coming at you! I guess light works a little differently in Star Wars, so I won't knock them for making a laser beam slower than the speed of light, which splits and automatically targets five separate planets at once.

But the best part, the most spectacular part about this new Death Star? Its name! Let me look it up here, I completely forgot due to the magnitude of their ingenuity.


Starkiller

STARKILLER

Let me move on, please.

Now, to the more sweeping topics, which basically encompass the entirety of the movie.

This movie is 100% a 2015 movie. What I mean by this is that they led with their expensive, digitally rendered foot forward. The story bares so many elements in common with the original trilogy that almost nothing is surprising. What could be surprising down the road is tossed into the audience's lap like a dirty sock, inside out, just in case you weren't sure what it was.

The greatest mystery remaining is Rey's origin, which is actually interesting and befuddling, but the fact is that there at least appear (for now) to be no hints as to where she came from. It's possible that she's Luke's daughter, but aside from her visions while holding Luke's lightsaber, there's nothing I remember to hint or indicate that.

Also, being that JJ Abrams was so heavy-handed with the rest of the secrets in this film, it's almost like he doesn't care. Like they don't matter.

And the story is so obvious and similar to the previous films that differences are jarring rather than refreshing.

The special effects were stellar, as far as I could tell, but maybe I missed some of them looking for a story worth extending my unfortunately short attention span.

I read online after seeing the movie, in a Youtube comments section, not to expect Original Trilogy quality from a brand new movie in 2015.

The amount of hype this movie has gotten has been basically without compare, not the least of which was the possibility of Jar Jar returning as a greater Sith Master than Sidious before him (still a possibility, really); in my view, the movie borrowed heavily from plot points of episode four and five, added all the fancy special effects their budget could afford, took on a gorgeous female lead, brought back a few of the most iconic characters from the original trilogy, and left compelling, innovative storytelling, good character development, and true depth behind.

I think C-3PO would do a better job writing and directing this trilogy than Abrams has thus far.

If anyone doubts it was a fun movie, fear not. It is that. If you don't care about a good plot, deep characters, or compelling villains, and just want to see a fun, flashy flick sometime, I recommend it...but only after the Avengers, Guardians of the Galaxy, the Lego Movie, or your Pixar movie of choice.

Am I judging the movie too harshly? Doubtless. But this is a sequel to a trilogy which is truly unequaled in its time. Star Wars is an epic. It is one of the most valuable movie franchises in history. It is enjoyed by children and adults alike. In order to achieve the same effect, JJ Abrams seems to have cheapened humor, depth, and character, making them all accessible, glib, and, in the end, boring.

I don't say this lightly. Certainly I should probably watch the movie again, maybe a few times, even return to the original trilogy with the same critical eye, but Han wasn't sly, irritable, and filled with foolhardy one-liners. His character sagged from too few bones, his words were shallow and his actions were those of far less a man than the scoundrel, smuggling scumbag we first met.

Leia wasn't proud or strong-willed. She didn't look much like a leader. She looked like a tired, impotent figurehead.

Luke, who we saw for mere moments, shows the depth of his character by his absence alone. As the last Jedi in the galaxy, he has a duty to essentially give his life to preserve the Jedi Order for generations to come. He seems to have given up based on the abandonment of one who was probably poised to be his best pupil.

As to imagination, fret not, for JJ Abrams has brought the galaxy far, far away into this world, with special effects which make you long for a world that bright, colorful, flashy.

This is a problem with movies and TV shows as a whole these days, but I believe this episode in the Star Wars franchise gave me no cause to imagine worlds more beautiful or ugly, as it was as clear as life itself. Can I blame him for this? I guess not; a director returning from the digital wonders we have today to the kind of old movie magic which made Star Wars in the first place would probably lose him his job.

But at the same time, given this incredible wealth of tools and skills, artists and effects, one could put together a story which both beckoned our imaginations to wake and see, to disbelieve and then believe, to challenge our minds to hope and dream, to wonder and think, to walk from that darkened room trembling with new eyes in our heads, new feet on our legs, and new hands on our arms.

The cinema is a medium of art with such incredible capacity to convey meaning, truth, and ideas, that it is incredible how few movies these days challenge our imaginations, our ideas, and our minds.

I argue that the Force Awakens fails to deliver wit without need for a "Get it?" sort of pause, and most of all fails to challenge us to imagine or understand the galaxy far, far away any better than we already do.


I think I have said my piece in good measure, for now. I'll probably see the movie again in a month or two, when it's at Riverview, but until then, these are my cogitations, and you take them or leave them.


!Noah!